Home
Advice Forum
What's new ?
ADHD
Narcolepsy
Brainstem
Disability
Epilepsy in ER
Gout
CP
Headache
HSP
Lumbar-Puncture
Lupus
Numbness
3rd nerve palsy
Parkinsons
PTC/ IIH/Pressure
Restless legs
Tremors,Tics etc
Vertigo
Weakness
Research
Scared of ALS?
Anxiety
Stroke or CVA
Multiple Sclerosis
Neurology basics
Nerve pain
Spasticity
Insomnia
Face Weakness
DONATE
Primitive Reflex
Happiness
Study Neurology
Sensation
Forum feed

How Multiple Sclerosis is diagnosed

The McDonald Multiple Sclerosis Criteria

McDonald criteria, MS diagnosis, Multiple sclerosis, MS diagnostic criteria

How to understand these diagnostic criteria

These criteria were published in "Annals of Neurology" in 2001 (McDonald et al, Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–127)and are used to diagnose multiple sclerosis and are the most recent and commonly used.Compared to previous criteria they allow an earlier diagnosis of multiple sclerosis which means that many people who now fit into the diagnostic criteria would not have previously done so.
It is very important to remember the following clarification:-

"Alternative diagnoses must be considered. There must be no better explanation for the clinical picture"

A typical MS plaque of demyelination in the spinal cord

MS plaque, spinal cord, demyelination, MRI








MS is a disease of the "white matter"


What is White Matter?

Ask a question about MS


Multiple sclerosis lecture and fulltext article access


Multiple sclerosis therapy:- latest research

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Search for more information

Google

Table text in simple text form:

Diagnostic Criteria
Clinical Presentation Additional Data Needed for DiagnosisTwo or more attacks; objective clinical evidence of 2 ormore lesionsNoneTwo or more attacks; objective clinical evidence of 1 lesion Dissemination in space, demonstrated byMRIorTwo or more MRI-detected lesions consistent with multiple scleosisplus positive CSForAwait further clinical attack implicating a different siteOne attack; objective clinical evidence of 2 or more lesions Dissemination in time, demonstrated byMRIorSecond clinical attackOne attack; objective clinical evidence of 1 lesion (monosymptomaticpresentation; clinically isolated syndrome)Dissemination in space, demonstrated byMRIorTwo or more MRI-detected lesions consistent with MS pluspositive CSFandDissemination in time, demonstrated byMRIorSecond clinical attackInsidious neurological progression suggestive of multiple sclerosis Positive CSFandDissemination in space, demonstrated by1) Nine or more T2 lesions in brain or 2) 2 or more lesionsin spinal cord, or 3) 4–8 brain plus 1 spinal cord lesionorabnormal VEP associated with 4–8 brain lesions, or withfewer than 4 brain lesions plus 1 spinal cord lesion demonstratedby MRIandDissemination in time, demonstrated byMRIorContinued progression for 1 yearIf criteria indicated are fulfilled, the diagnosis is made; if the criteria are not completely met, the diagnosis is “possible”;if the criteria are fully explored and not met, the diagnosis is “not made.”No additional tests are required; however, if tests [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebral spinal fluid (CSF)] are undertaken and arenegative, extreme caution should be taken before making a diagnosis of this condition. Alternative diagnoses must be considered. There must be no betterexplanation for the clinical picture.MRI demonstration of space dissemination must fulfill the criteria derived from Barkhof et and Tintore´ et al (see Table 1).Positive CSF determined by oligoclonal bands detected by established methods (preferably isoelectric focusing) different from any such bandsin serum or by a raised IgG index.14,15MRI demonstration of time dissemination must fulfill the criteria listed in Table 2.Abnormal visual evoked potential of the type seen in this condition (delay with a well-preserved wave form).


footer for Multiple Sclerosis page